EN
EnglishEspañol中文PortuguêsFrançaisالعربية日本語한국어

Updated Oct 10, 2026

Model comparison

The Latent benchmark database

Published benchmark results for 31 frontier models, kept in each benchmark's native units and grouped into 7 capability domains.

These results are scattered across lab announcements, leaderboards, and PDFs, and no two of them are reported the same way. This page gathers the benchmarks worth comparing into one table, exactly as their publishers reported them.

205benchmarks tracked
92with enough coverage to compare
113composites + excluded evidence
31frontier models tracked

17 benchmarks on this page

Knowledge & reasoning

Academic knowledge, mathematics, abstract reasoning, factuality, and long-context reasoning.

BenchmarkOpus 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 AstraOpenAIGemini 4 ArgonGoogleFable 5.1AnthropicSonnet 5.5AnthropicOpus 5AnthropicMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiFable 5AnthropicGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIGPT-6 SolOpenAIMuse Spark 1.3MetaDeepSeek V4.1-FlashDeepSeekGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIGrok 4.7xAIGrok 4.6xAIKimi K3Moonshot AIGLM-5.3Z.aiGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 LunaOpenAIGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIGLM 5.3 FlashZ.aiQwen3.8-MaxAlibabaMuse Spark 1.2MetaDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekMistral Large 4Mistral AIGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAISonnet 5AnthropicQwen3.8-27BAlibabaDeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekEvidence
AA-OmniscienceCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.46.4243.7342.3543.45-37.078.3840.1541.5327.1224.93-21.9732.0330.4819.714.329.5526.4810.670.650.057.473.427.20.83-5.3-10.2816.45-7.95-14.28—
ARC-AGI-1Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-98.5%-97.5%-97.5%-98.5%----97.5%-87.5%94.5%--95.5%--96.5%---90.5%-88%--89%—
ARC-AGI-2Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-95%-90%-90.4%-89.2%----92.5%-67.1%60.4%--84.6%--83.9%---61.3%-59.5%--61.4%SourceCitation
ARC-AGI-3 (standard harness)Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-62.71%---30.16%------7.78%-2.11%------0.8%-----0.18%---—
CritPtCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.31.71%31.71%27.14%29.7%-29.14%26.57%28.6%31.71%30.86%26%-32.29%18%19.71%23.43%19.14%18.29%14.29%22.57%19.43%30%15.43%20%17.71%18%10.57%20.57%16.86%5.43%16.57%—
FrontierMath v2 Tier 4Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-97.56%-87.8%-73.17%-87.8%----82.93%--39.02%29.27%-36.59%--70.73%-46.3%-26.83%-60.98%29.27%-24.4%—
GPQA DiamondCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-96.26%-93.74%-93.74%-92.6%--94.14%90.9%94.14%-94.95%93.54%91.72%95.25%94.55%--92.53%-92.73%90.4%92.83%-91.11%91.11%90.51%91.31%SourceCitation
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.64.4%54.68%-59.13%56.9%54.87%49.35%53.3%--49.07%36.8%49.49%43.14%44.07%46.9%42.26%47.82%47.87%45.9%-42.91%-43.05%45.46%41.01%-39.48%41.29%33.92%38.55%—
LiveBenchCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-82.16%-83.41%-80.08%-82.97%--81.59%-81.05%-78.04%79.19%76.14%75.83%78.8%--77.94%-78.5%78%77.44%-73.56%76.04%75.27%74.17%SourceCitation
MathArena - ArXivLean Jun 2026Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-63.83%---31.25%-14.58%----37.5%------------------—
MathArena - ArXivMath Jun 2026Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-94.44%-90.97%-80.95%-83.67%----86.73%--72.11%-68.03%63.27%-----------42.86%—
MathArena - ArXivMath May 2026Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-95%-87.5%---87.5%-------61.67%--------------55.83%—
MathArena - BrokenArXiv Jun 2026Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-99.07%-84.72%-90.74%-47.84%----67.28%--51.85%-20.83%11.11%-----------16.67%—
MLCR-AA (Medical Long Context Reasoning)Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-35%-71.11%-59.44%-64.44%----26.11%-12.22%38.33%48.33%-15%--31.67%-19.44%31.11%17.78%-19.44%55%21.67%13.33%—
MMLU Pro - ValsCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.---92.38%-91.59%-91.5%----89.1%-89.4%87.97%86.77%90.22%90.12%--86.66%-88.6%88.28%86.97%-86.04%87.55%84.34%86.21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles v1.0.4 - EpochCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-84%-58%-59%-52%----58%--26%33%-37%--35%---43%-21%35%-34%—
ProofBench v1.1 - ValsCurrent values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-99%-100%-99%-95%----83%-51%87%49%48%58%--74%-58%43%50%-60%77%16%56%—

3 benchmarks on this page

Coding & software engineering

Agentic terminal work, issue resolution, long-horizon engineering, competitive coding, and autonomous ML engineering.

BenchmarkOpus 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 AstraOpenAIGemini 4 ArgonGoogleFable 5.1AnthropicSonnet 5.5AnthropicOpus 5AnthropicMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiFable 5AnthropicGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIGPT-6 SolOpenAIMuse Spark 1.3MetaDeepSeek V4.1-FlashDeepSeekGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIGrok 4.7xAIGrok 4.6xAIKimi K3Moonshot AIGLM-5.3Z.aiGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleClaude Haiku 5.5AnthropicGPT-6 LunaOpenAIGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIGLM 5.3 FlashZ.aiQwen3.8-MaxAlibabaMuse Spark 1.2MetaDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekMistral Large 4Mistral AIGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAISonnet 5AnthropicQwen3.8-27BAlibabaDeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekEvidence
APEX-SWE (Pass@1, Terminus-2)Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.---63.6%-63.7%-58.8%----45.8%-56.4%48%------------46.4%-46.9%—
Code Arena WebDev (overall)Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-1,797-1,762-1,688-1,629--1,622-1,617-1,6251,6741,6091,5671,587--1,520-1,6701,534--1,5191,5371,594-—
Code Migration †Current values follow the best-published-reasoning-mode policy. Individual source, configuration and admission decisions are disclosed on /methodology#model-evidence. Collected values without a matching review remain visible but do not contribute.-67.74%-54.61%-57.47%-55.06%----52.92%-44.57%16.1%44.22%36.55%34.8%--47.8%-23.96%29.95%41.54%-44.55%44.39%14.16%38.63%SourceCitation

Reading this table

Native units, nothing adjusted

Units

Cells show each benchmark's native scale: accuracy percentages, Elo ratings, or points. Nothing is rescaled or converted, so compare along a row. Two different rows are two different scales.

Best in row

The strongest published result in each row is highlighted. A blank cell means that model has no published result on that benchmark, which is not the same as a zero.

What gets listed

A benchmark earns a row when its result is published against a named model version with a stated metric, and when enough models have run it for the comparison to mean something. Numbers we cannot trace back to a source are left out.

Provenance

Results are current as of 2026-10-10. Vendor-reported head-to-head rows are named as such (e.g. “Anthropic H2H”) and carry their caveats in the row notes.

Evidence downloads: manifest · dataset JSON · results CSV · citations CSV