Grok 4.6: score and benchmark evidence

Historical release · · xAI

105.7 points · Rank 7 among 19 ranked models · Stability range 97.1–115.5 points.

Rank follows the point estimate; it does not establish statistically significant superiority. The scale is anchored at mean 100, SD 15 in the frozen calibration cohort, not human IQ or a percentage.

One capability score combines evidence across seven equally weighted domains. Related benchmark variants share a family budget, and influence from one evaluator is capped.

Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-06-db. Methodology and limitations for this release.

This page preserves historical evidence. See the current model record.

Capability domains

Domain scores use calibration-cohort standard-deviation units. Unmeasured domains are shown as unavailable, not zero.

DomainScore (SD units)Observed benchmarks
Knowledge & reasoning0.176
Coding & software engineering0.359
Agentic tool & computer use0.394
Professional & real-world work-0.014
Multimodal & vision0.092
Cybersecurity0.081
Preference & communication-0.031

Published benchmark evidence

27 results contribute to this score, from 59 collected results and 25 contributing benchmark families. Counts are not independent sample sizes.

Results, source citations, review decisions and compatible reasoning modes are stored in a versioned relational database. Each publication uses a sealed, checksum-verified export; CSV files are optional exports, not editable scoring inputs. Previous revisions remain available for audit. Collected means a numeric result exists in the database. Used means its source, exact model checkpoint and benchmark protocol have been reviewed and its benchmark has a frozen calibration supported by multiple providers. For each benchmark we select the highest published aggregate across comparable reasoning modes, not necessarily maximum effort, and count it once. More tested settings provide more chances to record a high score; this selection advantage is not corrected by the conditional interval. Developer-reported and sole/unspecified settings remain eligible and disclosed. Unresolved does not mean false or useless: conflicting metrics, unverified citations and unmatched versions stay collected until reconciled.

The bar estimates score stability under the scoring assumptions: a fixed calibration and comparable benchmark availability. It resamples benchmark families and evaluators while keeping each domain’s evidence strength fixed, then adds a frozen correction learned from missing-evidence tests. Benchmark count and domain coverage both affect that correction. It does not add a second full capability-posterior draw or uncertainty from changing the reference calibration. It is not a guarantee under selective publication, new benchmark domains or future model releases.

Reporting sensitivity: ±5.6 points. Sensitivity to selectively published results. This stress range is not a confidence interval or a probability statement.

  1. GDPval-AA v2 (Elo): 1665.73 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  2. Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.389513%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: pass@1, AA harness

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  3. DeepSWE v1.1: 67.477876%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: grok-4-6; medium; mini-swe-agent

    Metric: pass@1 over scored rollout attempts

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Selected the best pass@1 across published reasoning efforts within mini-swe-agent. Pass@4 is not substituted.

  4. LMArena (Chatbot Arena) — Text: 1461.15072 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: grok-4.6-high; Arena text overall; style control enabled

    Metric: style-controlled text overall Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published reasoning-mode rating within the same text overall board. Different leaderboard slices and undated earlier DeepSeek checkpoints are not pooled.

  5. AA Intelligence Index v4.1.1 (score): 61 native-points

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  6. GPQA Diamond: 94.949495%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  7. AA-LCR: 75%

    Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: unresolved.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high)

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Current AA result is LCR v1.1. The inherited AA-LCR row has no reviewed version match; a new version cannot silently substantiate the older value.

  8. Finance Agent v2 — Vals: 53.68%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 53.68 for Grok 4.6 High on Finance Agent v2 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  9. Excel Modeling Benchmark — Vals: 62.57%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 62.57 for Grok 4.6 High on Excel Modeling Benchmark — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  10. SciCode: 56.481481%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA harness

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  11. Humanity's Last Exam (no tools): 44.068582%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, no tools, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  12. Legal Research Bench — Vals: 48.08%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48.08 for Grok 4.6 High on Legal Research Bench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  13. Harvey LAB (Vals): 15.8%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 15.8 for Grok 4.6 High on Harvey LAB (Vals) still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  14. AA-Briefcase Overall Elo: 1549.11 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: overall Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  15. MedScribe — Vals: 86.53%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 86.53 for Grok 4.6 High on MedScribe — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  16. SWE-bench Verified — Vals: 95.6%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 95.6 for Grok 4.6 High on SWE-bench Verified — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  17. LegalBench — Vals: 86.31%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 86.31 for Grok 4.6 High on LegalBench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  18. TaxEval v2 — Vals: 71.1%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 71.1 for Grok 4.6 High on TaxEval v2 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  19. Vals Index: 71.1%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  20. Public Benefits Bench — Vals: 66.85%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 66.85 for Grok 4.6 High on Public Benefits Bench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  21. MedCode — Vals: 44.71%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 44.71 for Grok 4.6 High on MedCode — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  22. AA-Omniscience: 30.483333 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: knowledge reliability index -100 to 100

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  23. MMLU Pro — Vals: 89.4%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 89.4 for Grok 4.6 High on MMLU Pro — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  24. LiveBench: 78.042%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: grok-4.6; LiveBench 2026-06-25 release

    Metric: official overall: equal mean of seven category means

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Task mapping archived from categories_2026_06_25.json. Aggregate follows the official UI, not a flat mean of the 23 tasks. Undated old DeepSeek checkpoints excluded.

  25. MortgageTax — Vals: 64.19%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 64.19 for Grok 4.6 High on MortgageTax — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  26. SAGE — Vals: 28.9%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 28.9 for Grok 4.6 High on SAGE — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  27. Code Migration †: 44.57%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 44.57 for Grok 4.6 High on Code Migration † still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  28. Terminal-Bench v3.0: 26.5%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Grok Build

    Metric: resolution rate on v3.0 task set

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  29. LiveCodeBench: 88.22%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 88.22 for Grok 4.6 High on LiveCodeBench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  30. CyberGym: 79.7%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 79.7 for Grok 4.6 High on CyberGym still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  31. SWE-Marathon v1.1: 31.9%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 31.9 for Grok 4.6 High on SWE-Marathon v1.1 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  32. CursorBench v3.2: 70.8%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 Extra High; Cursor harness

    Metric: CursorBench 3.2 score percentage

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  33. APEX-Agents Mean Criteria Passed: 57.5%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: grok-4-6; high; loop_truncated_tools_agent

    Metric: mean-score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  34. APEX-SWE (Pass@1, Terminus-2): 56.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: grok-4-6; high; terminus-2

    Metric: pass-1

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  35. ARC-AGI-2: 67.1%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 67.1 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-2 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  36. SimpleQA: 53%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 53 for Grok 4.6 High on SimpleQA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  37. FrontierCode v1.1 Extended: 61.31%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6; high; grok-build

    Metric: v1.1 Extended cost-adjusted new_score, 150 tasks

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  38. OfficeQA Pro †: 63.2%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 63.2 for Grok 4.6 High on OfficeQA Pro † still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  39. FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H: 48%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48 for Grok 4.6 High on FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  40. τ³-Banking: 50.721649%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: strict task success, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  41. CritPt: 19.714286%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA official grading

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  42. Terminal-Bench 4.0: 20.3%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6; high; Grok Build

    Metric: resolution rate, v4.0.0 66 tasks

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  43. GDP.pdf: 17.2%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xHigh reasoning); Surge original evaluation

    Metric: all-pass percentage, original Surge GDP.pdf

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  44. ProofBench v1.1 — Vals: 51%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 51 for Grok 4.6 High on ProofBench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  45. Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals: 76.24%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 76.24 for Grok 4.6 High on Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  46. MineBench: 1931 native-points

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Unresolved Pro/base model identities in source catalog; exclude until matched.

  47. ARC-AGI-1: 87.5%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 87.5 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-1 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  48. ARC-AGI-3 (standard harness): 2.11%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 2.11 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-3 (standard harness) still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  49. EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA: 48.34%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48.34 for Grok 4.6 High on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  50. MLCR-AA (Medical Long Context Reasoning): 12.222222%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: overall accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  51. AA-AnalystAgent: 41.25%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  52. Vending-Bench 2: 9047.0325 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6; Andon Labs Vending-Bench 2

    Metric: arithmetic mean final bank balance USD after one simulated year

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Compare reasoning configurations using their mean over runs. Geometric mean, individual best runs, Fireworks Kimi endpoint, Vending Arena, and April DeepSeek Pro are not substituted.

  53. CWE-bench: 38.2%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 High; high reasoning; grok-cli

    Metric: v0 Sept 1 deterministic pass@1, 100 tasks; exploit blocked and existing tests pass

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Published high effort matches this model configuration. Other models pinned to max/xhigh are not approved from this high-only board.

  54. ZeroBench: 17%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); official main questions

    Metric: pass@5, 100 main questions, no tools, August 2026 grading

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  55. BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals: 72.222%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 72.222 for Grok 4.6 High on BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  56. Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals: 70.788%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 70.788 for Grok 4.6 High on Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  57. RuneBench (30m, mean ln(1 + XP/min)): 5.621351 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: grok46-xhigh

    Metric: Arithmetic mean of ln(1 + peakXpRate) over all 16 skills, exactly as the owner’s Heatmap.js default ranking. Data rates are already normalized; do not divide by 200 again.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

  58. VoxelBench (text-to-voxel, Glicko-2): 2099 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xHigh)

    Metric: Glicko-2 rating from the text-to-voxel board; not win percentage, deviation, image-input mode or MineBench Elo.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

  59. Code Arena WebDev (overall): 1625 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: grok-4.6-high

    Metric: Published overall WebDev preference rating, not task success percentage or Arena Text score.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

Cite this model record

The Latent. “Grok 4.6: score and benchmark evidence.” 2026-09-06. Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-06-db.

Download release data and definitions (JSON) · Data usage terms