Kimi K3: score and benchmark evidence

Historical release · · Moonshot AI

104.9 points · Rank 8 among 19 ranked models · Stability range 95.4–113.7 points.

Rank follows the point estimate; it does not establish statistically significant superiority. The scale is anchored at mean 100, SD 15 in the frozen calibration cohort, not human IQ or a percentage.

One capability score combines evidence across seven equally weighted domains. Related benchmark variants share a family budget, and influence from one evaluator is capped.

Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-06. Methodology and limitations for this release.

This page preserves historical evidence. See the current model record.

Capability domains

Domain scores use calibration-cohort standard-deviation units. Unmeasured domains are shown as unavailable, not zero.

DomainScore (SD units)Observed benchmarks
Knowledge & reasoning-0.1014
Coding & software engineering0.1511
Agentic tool & computer use-0.0211
Professional & real-world work0.0316
Multimodal & vision0.208
CybersecurityUnavailable0
Preference & communication0.524

Published benchmark evidence

64 results contribute to this score, from 93 collected results and 60 contributing benchmark families. Counts are not independent sample sizes.

Collected means a numeric result exists in the database. Used means its source, exact model checkpoint and benchmark protocol have been reviewed and its benchmark has a frozen calibration supported by multiple providers. For each benchmark we select the highest published aggregate across comparable reasoning modes, not necessarily maximum effort, and count it once. More tested settings provide more chances to record a high score; this selection advantage is not corrected by the conditional interval. Developer-reported and sole/unspecified settings remain eligible and disclosed. Unresolved does not mean false or useless: conflicting metrics, unverified citations and unmatched versions stay collected until reconciled.

The bar estimates score stability under the scoring assumptions: a fixed calibration and comparable benchmark availability. It resamples benchmark families and evaluators while keeping each domain’s evidence strength fixed, then adds a frozen correction learned from missing-evidence tests. Benchmark count and domain coverage both affect that correction. It does not add a second full capability-posterior draw or uncertainty from changing the reference calibration. It is not a guarantee under selective publication, new benchmark domains or future model releases.

Reporting sensitivity: ±1.1 points. Sensitivity to selectively published results. This stress range is not a confidence interval or a probability statement.

  1. GDPval-AA v2 (Elo): 1587.5 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  2. Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.018727%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: pass@1, AA harness

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  3. DeepSWE v1.1: 68.514412%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max; mini-swe-agent

    Metric: pass@1 over scored rollout attempts

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Selected the best pass@1 across published reasoning efforts within mini-swe-agent. Pass@4 is not substituted.

  4. LMArena (Chatbot Arena) — Text: 1488.665886 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3-max; Arena text overall; style control enabled

    Metric: style-controlled text overall Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published reasoning-mode rating within the same text overall board. Different leaderboard slices and undated earlier DeepSeek checkpoints are not pooled.

  5. AA Intelligence Index v4.1.1 (score): 60 native-points

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  6. GPQA Diamond: 93.535354%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  7. AA-LCR: 74.7%

    Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: unresolved.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max)

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Current AA result is LCR v1.1. The inherited AA-LCR row has no reviewed version match; a new version cannot silently substantiate the older value.

  8. Finance Agent v2 — Vals: 54.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI Finance Agent v2 harness

    Metric: Task success

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  9. Excel Modeling Benchmark — Vals: 66.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI Excel Modeling overall evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  10. SciCode: 59.490741%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA harness

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  11. Humanity's Last Exam (no tools): 46.895273%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, no tools, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  12. Legal Research Bench — Vals: 44.23%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI Legal Research overall harness

    Metric: Task success

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  13. Harvey LAB (Vals): 10.83%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 10.83 for Kimi K3 on Harvey LAB (Vals) still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  14. AA-Briefcase Overall Elo: 1499.88 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: overall Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  15. MedScribe — Vals: 87.96%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI health evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  16. SWE-bench Verified — Vals: 93.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI mini-SWE-agent bash harness

    Metric: Resolved issue rate

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  17. LegalBench — Vals: 86.02%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI LegalBench evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  18. TaxEval v2 — Vals: 75.72%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI max-compute evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  19. KingBench 3: 77.5%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 77.5 for Kimi K3 on KingBench 3 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  20. Vals Index: 74.7%

    Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: excluded.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI index methodology

    Metric: Composite score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  21. Public Benefits Bench — Vals: 68.27%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI public-benefits evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  22. MedCode — Vals: 48.88%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI health evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  23. AutomationBench v1.0.6: 46.7%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 46.7 for Kimi K3 on AutomationBench v1.0.6 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  24. AA-Omniscience: 19.7 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: knowledge reliability index -100 to 100

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  25. MMLU Pro — Vals: 87.97%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI five-shot MMLU-Pro harness

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  26. LiveBench: 79.193048%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; LiveBench 2026-06-25 release

    Metric: official overall: equal mean of seven category means

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Task mapping archived from categories_2026_06_25.json. Aggregate follows the official UI, not a flat mean of the 23 tasks. Undated old DeepSeek checkpoints excluded.

  27. CorpFin v2 — Vals: 71.56%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI CorpFin v2 evaluation with Sonnet 4.5 judge

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  28. MortgageTax — Vals: 66.34%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI max-compute evaluation

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  29. SAGE — Vals: 54.26%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI max-compute evaluation

    Metric: Score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  30. Code Migration †: 16.1%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 16.1 for Kimi K3 on Code Migration † still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  31. Toolathlon-Verified: 76.5%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi Kimi K3 (max) ✓; Default agent

    Metric: pass@1, verified tasks

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  32. Agents' Last Exam: 28.3%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; Max; Kimi Code

    Metric: pass rate, ALE-V1 147 tasks; not partial score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  33. Terminal-Bench v3.0: 17.4%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 17.4 for Kimi K3 on Terminal-Bench v3.0 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  34. LiveCodeBench: 87.19%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 87.19 for Kimi K3 on LiveCodeBench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  35. CyberGym: 80%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 80 for Kimi K3 on CyberGym still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  36. Humanity's Last Exam w/ tools: 59.8%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 59.8 for Kimi K3 on Humanity's Last Exam w/ tools still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  37. Design Arena (Elo): 1453 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Design Arena 2026-08-11 rating snapshot

    Metric: Elo rating

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  38. Vals Multimodal Index: 73.42%

    Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: excluded.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Vals AI multimodal index methodology

    Metric: Composite score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  39. SWE-Marathon v1.1: 48.1%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48.1 for Kimi K3 on SWE-Marathon v1.1 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  40. ProgramBench v1 (Raw Pass Rate) — Vals: 62.768%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi/kimi-k3 · Vals published row (effort not stated)

    Metric: Raw Pass Rate: mean percent of hidden behavioral tests passed per task. Not Fully Resolved (all tests pass) and not Almost Resolved (≥95% of tests pass).

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-05

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

  41. FrontierSWE: 81.2%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: FrontierSWE

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  42. FrontierMath v2 Tier 4: 39.02439%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3_max; task version 2.0.0

    Metric: mean score percentage, FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Exact Epoch task version; selected best mean score across reported reasoning configurations. No pooling of task versions or substitution of best scorer output.

  43. CursorBench v3.2: 60.8%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 Max; Cursor harness

    Metric: CursorBench 3.2 score percentage

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  44. APEX-Agents Mean Criteria Passed: 55.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max; loop_truncated_tools_agent

    Metric: mean-score

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  45. CharXiv (with CI / RQ): 91.3%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; with Python tools

    Metric: CharXiv (RQ)

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  46. APEX-SWE (Pass@1, Terminus-2): 48%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max; terminus-2

    Metric: pass-1

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  47. BrowseComp: 91.2%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: BrowseComp

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  48. MMMU-Pro: 80.520231%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  49. ARC-AGI-2: 60.4%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; Max; ARC Prize standard harness

    Metric: semi-private verified score percentage

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best reasoning variant within the verified standard-harness summary. Provider Adapter, public tasks and community agent scores are not substituted.

  50. OSWorld 2.0 — Anthropic H2H: 58.3%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: third_party. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; Anthropic Opus 5 published head-to-head setup

    Metric: Task success

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  51. ExploitBench: 32.2%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Inherited comparator metric/scaffold equivalence to Astra Cap Percent is not established; the source flags possible contamination. Excluded pending protocol audit.

  52. PostTrainBench: 36.6%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: PostTrainBench

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  53. FrontierCode v1.1 Extended: 58.19%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; none; mini-swe-agent

    Metric: v1.1 Extended cost-adjusted new_score, 150 tasks

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  54. JobBench: 54.3%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: JobBench

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  55. BabyVision (with CI): 85.7%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; with Python tools

    Metric: BabyVision w/ python

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  56. PerceptionBench: 58.5%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: PerceptionBench

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  57. OSWorld-Verified: 84.8%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: OSWorld-Verified

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  58. Creative Writing v3: 2070.8 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; published evaluation, effort unspecified

    Metric: Creative Writing v3 Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Exact checkpoint on the evaluator-hosted board. A starred model is externally submitted; it is not claimed as independently rerun by the benchmark owner.

  59. MathArena — ArXivMath Jun 2026: 72.11%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: benchmark_org. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; MathArena June 2026 competition harness

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  60. MathArena — BrokenArXiv Jun 2026: 51.85%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: benchmark_org. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; MathArena June 2026 competition harness

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  61. AIIQ Composite IQ: 122 native-points

    Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: excluded.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; AIIQ composite snapshot

    Metric: Composite IQ

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Held-out composite, never a scoring input

  62. MCP Atlas †: 84.2%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: MCP-Atlas

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  63. OfficeQA Pro †: 63.3%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: OfficeQA Pro

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  64. EQ-Bench 4: 1339.3 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: moonshotai/kimi-k3; evaluator published configuration, effort unspecified

    Metric: EQ-Bench 4 Elo

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  65. NL2Repo: 58%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 58 for Kimi K3 on NL2Repo still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  66. τ²-Bench Telecom: 80.63%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 80.63 for Kimi K3 on τ²-Bench Telecom still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  67. FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H: 44.2%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 44.2 for Kimi K3 on FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  68. MathArena — ArXivMath May 2026: 61.67%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: benchmark_org. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3; max effort; MathArena May 2026 competition harness

    Metric: Accuracy

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-08-16T00:00:00.000Z

    Exact-value match to an existing verified, comparable, pinned-configuration observation. Archived review retained; not asserted newly independently replicated.

  69. τ³-Banking: 45.979381%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: strict task success, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  70. CritPt: 23.428571%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA official grading

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 2 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  71. GDP.pdf: 19%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (Max reasoning); Surge original evaluation

    Metric: all-pass percentage, original Surge GDP.pdf

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  72. ProofBench v1.1 — Vals: 87%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 87 for Kimi K3 on ProofBench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  73. Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals: 84.96%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 84.96 for Kimi K3 on Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  74. MineBench: 1812 native-points

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.

    Unresolved Pro/base model identities in source catalog; exclude until matched.

  75. ARC-AGI-1: 94.5%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; Max; ARC Prize standard harness

    Metric: semi-private verified score percentage

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best reasoning variant within the verified standard-harness summary. Provider Adapter, public tasks and community agent scores are not substituted.

  76. Harvey LAB-AA: 94.64%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 94.64 for Kimi K3 on Harvey LAB-AA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  77. EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA: 45.33%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 45.33 for Kimi K3 on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  78. MLCR-AA (Medical Long Context Reasoning): 38.333333%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: overall accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  79. AA-AnalystAgent: 38.75%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  80. ITBench-AA: 47.693032%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (max); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness

    Metric: root cause accuracy, AA

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.

  81. DeepSearchQA: 95%

    Not used in the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: DeepSearchQA (F1)

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  82. Vending-Bench 2: 5165.035 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (Moonshot); Andon Labs Vending-Bench 2

    Metric: arithmetic mean final bank balance USD after one simulated year

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Compare reasoning configurations using their mean over runs. Geometric mean, individual best runs, Fireworks Kimi endpoint, Vending Arena, and April DeepSeek Pro are not substituted.

  83. IFBench: 74.4%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 74.4 for Kimi K3 on IFBench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  84. CWE-bench: 22.5%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 22.5 for Kimi K3 on CWE-bench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  85. ZeroBench: 23%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 23 for Kimi K3 on ZeroBench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  86. MathVision (with CI): 97.8%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; with Python tools

    Metric: MathVision

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  87. OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%

    Contributes to the score. Developer-reported. Review status: reviewed-developer.

    Configuration: Kimi K3; max; Kimi developer comparison table; benchmark-specific configuration

    Metric: OmniDocBench

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.

  88. Mystery Game Puzzles v1.0.4 — Epoch: 26%

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.

    Configuration: kimi-k3_max; task version 1.0.4

    Metric: mean score percentage, Mystery Game Puzzles

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Exact Epoch task version; selected best mean score across reported reasoning configurations. No pooling of task versions or substitution of best scorer output.

  89. BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals: 71.481%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 71.481 for Kimi K3 on BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  90. Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals: 68.672%

    Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.

    Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 68.672 for Kimi K3 on Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.

  91. RuneBench (30m, mean ln(1 + XP/min)): 3.753577 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi3

    Metric: Arithmetic mean of ln(1 + peakXpRate) over all 16 skills, exactly as the owner’s Heatmap.js default ranking. Data rates are already normalized; do not divide by 200 again.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

  92. VoxelBench (text-to-voxel, Glicko-2): 1932 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: Kimi K3 (Max)

    Metric: Glicko-2 rating from the text-to-voxel board; not win percentage, deviation, image-input mode or MineBench Elo.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

  93. Code Arena WebDev (overall): 1674 native-points

    Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.

    Configuration: kimi-k3-max

    Metric: Published overall WebDev preference rating, not task success percentage or Arena Text score.

    Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06

    Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.

Cite this model record

The Latent. “Kimi K3: score and benchmark evidence.” 2026-09-06. Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-06.

Download release data and definitions (JSON) · Data usage terms

Related reporting

These dated stories provide reporting context; they may describe an earlier release.