Grok 4.6: score and benchmark evidence
Historical release · · xAI
105.7 points · Rank 8 among 20 ranked models · Stability range 97.1–115.5 points.
Rank follows the point estimate; it does not establish statistically significant superiority. The scale is anchored at mean 100, SD 15 in the frozen calibration cohort, not human IQ or a percentage.
One score summarizes demonstrated capability across published reasoning settings and seven equally weighted domains. Related benchmark variants share a family budget, and influence from one evaluator is capped.
Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-10-deepseek-3. Methodology and limitations for this release.
This page preserves historical evidence. See the current model record.
Capability domains
Domain scores use calibration-cohort standard-deviation units. Unmeasured domains are shown as unavailable, not zero.
| Domain | Score (SD units) | Observed benchmarks |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & reasoning | 0.17 | 6 |
| Coding & software engineering | 0.35 | 9 |
| Agentic tool & computer use | 0.39 | 4 |
| Professional & real-world work | -0.01 | 4 |
| Multimodal & vision | 0.09 | 2 |
| Cybersecurity | 0.08 | 1 |
| Preference & communication | -0.03 | 1 |
Published benchmark evidence
27 results contribute to this score, from 59 collected results and 25 contributing benchmark families. Counts are not independent sample sizes.
Results, source citations, review decisions and compatible reasoning modes are stored in a versioned relational database. Each publication uses a sealed, checksum-verified export; CSV files are optional exports, not editable scoring inputs. Previous revisions remain available for audit. Collected means a numeric result exists in the database. Used means its source, exact model checkpoint and benchmark protocol have been reviewed and its benchmark has a frozen calibration supported by multiple providers. For each benchmark we select the highest published aggregate across comparable reasoning modes, not necessarily maximum effort, and count it once. More tested settings provide more chances to record a high score; this selection advantage is not corrected by the conditional interval. Developer-reported and sole/unspecified settings remain eligible and disclosed. Unresolved does not mean false or useless: conflicting metrics, unverified citations and unmatched versions stay collected until reconciled.
The score stability range is a 95% bootstrap score interval conditional on frozen calibration and comparable evidence availability. It resamples benchmark families and evaluators and adds a frozen missing-evidence correction. It excludes selection across reasoning settings, selective publication, calibration changes and new domains. It is not a 95% guarantee about true capability or where a future score will land. Sparse or conflicting evidence can widen the range.
Reporting sensitivity: ±5.6 points. Sensitivity to selectively published results. This stress range is not a confidence interval or a probability statement.
GDPval-AA v2 (Elo): 1665.73 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: Elo
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.389513%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: pass@1, AA harness
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
DeepSWE v1.1: 67.477876%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: grok-4-6; medium; mini-swe-agent
Metric: pass@1 over scored rollout attempts
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Selected the best pass@1 across published reasoning efforts within mini-swe-agent. Pass@4 is not substituted.
LMArena (Chatbot Arena) — Text: 1461.15072 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: grok-4.6-high; Arena text overall; style control enabled
Metric: style-controlled text overall Elo
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published reasoning-mode rating within the same text overall board. Different leaderboard slices and undated earlier DeepSeek checkpoints are not pooled.
AA Intelligence Index v4.1.1 (score): 61 native-points
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.
Held-out composite, never a scoring input
GPQA Diamond: 94.949495%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: accuracy, AA
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
AA-LCR: 75%
Not used in the score. Source category: independent. Review status: unresolved.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high)
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Current AA result is LCR v1.1. The inherited AA-LCR row has no reviewed version match; a new version cannot silently substantiate the older value.
Finance Agent v2 — Vals: 53.68%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 53.68 for Grok 4.6 High on Finance Agent v2 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Excel Modeling Benchmark — Vals: 62.57%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 62.57 for Grok 4.6 High on Excel Modeling Benchmark — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
SciCode: 56.481481%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: accuracy, AA harness
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools): 44.068582%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: accuracy, no tools, AA
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
Legal Research Bench — Vals: 48.08%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48.08 for Grok 4.6 High on Legal Research Bench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Harvey LAB (Vals): 15.8%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 15.8 for Grok 4.6 High on Harvey LAB (Vals) still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
AA-Briefcase Overall Elo: 1549.11 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: overall Elo
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
MedScribe — Vals: 86.53%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 86.53 for Grok 4.6 High on MedScribe — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
SWE-bench Verified — Vals: 95.6%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 95.6 for Grok 4.6 High on SWE-bench Verified — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
LegalBench — Vals: 86.31%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 86.31 for Grok 4.6 High on LegalBench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
TaxEval v2 — Vals: 71.1%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 71.1 for Grok 4.6 High on TaxEval v2 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Vals Index: 71.1%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.
Held-out composite, never a scoring input
Public Benefits Bench — Vals: 66.85%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 66.85 for Grok 4.6 High on Public Benefits Bench — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
MedCode — Vals: 44.71%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 44.71 for Grok 4.6 High on MedCode — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
AA-Omniscience: 30.483333 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: knowledge reliability index -100 to 100
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
MMLU Pro — Vals: 89.4%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 89.4 for Grok 4.6 High on MMLU Pro — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
LiveBench: 78.042%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: grok-4.6; LiveBench 2026-06-25 release
Metric: official overall: equal mean of seven category means
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Task mapping archived from categories_2026_06_25.json. Aggregate follows the official UI, not a flat mean of the 23 tasks. Undated old DeepSeek checkpoints excluded.
MortgageTax — Vals: 64.19%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 64.19 for Grok 4.6 High on MortgageTax — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
SAGE — Vals: 28.9%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 28.9 for Grok 4.6 High on SAGE — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Code Migration †: 44.57%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 44.57 for Grok 4.6 High on Code Migration † still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Terminal-Bench v3.0: 26.5%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Grok Build
Metric: resolution rate on v3.0 task set
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
LiveCodeBench: 88.22%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 88.22 for Grok 4.6 High on LiveCodeBench still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
CyberGym: 79.7%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 79.7 for Grok 4.6 High on CyberGym still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
SWE-Marathon v1.1: 31.9%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 31.9 for Grok 4.6 High on SWE-Marathon v1.1 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
CursorBench v3.2: 70.8%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 Extra High; Cursor harness
Metric: CursorBench 3.2 score percentage
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
APEX-Agents Mean Criteria Passed: 57.5%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: grok-4-6; high; loop_truncated_tools_agent
Metric: mean-score
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
APEX-SWE (Pass@1, Terminus-2): 56.4%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: grok-4-6; high; terminus-2
Metric: pass-1
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
ARC-AGI-2: 67.1%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 67.1 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-2 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
SimpleQA: 53%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 53 for Grok 4.6 High on SimpleQA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
FrontierCode v1.1 Extended: 61.31%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6; high; grok-build
Metric: v1.1 Extended cost-adjusted new_score, 150 tasks
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
OfficeQA Pro †: 63.2%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 63.2 for Grok 4.6 High on OfficeQA Pro † still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H: 48%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48 for Grok 4.6 High on FrontierCode v1.1 Main — Anthropic H2H still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
τ³-Banking: 50.721649%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: strict task success, AA
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
CritPt: 19.714286%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: accuracy, AA official grading
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 4 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
Terminal-Bench 4.0: 20.3%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6; high; Grok Build
Metric: resolution rate, v4.0.0 66 tasks
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
GDP.pdf: 17.2%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xHigh reasoning); Surge original evaluation
Metric: all-pass percentage, original Surge GDP.pdf
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
ProofBench v1.1 — Vals: 51%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 51 for Grok 4.6 High on ProofBench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals: 76.24%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 76.24 for Grok 4.6 High on Vibe Code Bench v1.1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
MineBench: 1931 native-points
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: excluded.
Unresolved Pro/base model identities in source catalog; exclude until matched.
ARC-AGI-1: 87.5%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 87.5 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-1 still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
ARC-AGI-3 (standard harness): 2.11%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 2.11 for Grok 4.6 High on ARC-AGI-3 (standard harness) still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA: 48.34%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 48.34 for Grok 4.6 High on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
MLCR-AA (Medical Long Context Reasoning): 12.222222%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: overall accuracy, AA
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
AA-AnalystAgent: 41.25%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (high); Artificial Analysis published evaluation harness
Metric: accuracy, AA
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Best published result among 1 reasoning configurations of the exact AA model release; fallback configurations excluded.
Vending-Bench 2: 9047.0325 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6; Andon Labs Vending-Bench 2
Metric: arithmetic mean final bank balance USD after one simulated year
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Compare reasoning configurations using their mean over runs. Geometric mean, individual best runs, Fireworks Kimi endpoint, Vending Arena, and April DeepSeek Pro are not substituted.
CWE-bench: 38.2%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 High; high reasoning; grok-cli
Metric: v0 Sept 1 deterministic pass@1, 100 tasks; exploit blocked and existing tests pass
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Published high effort matches this model configuration. Other models pinned to max/xhigh are not approved from this high-only board.
ZeroBench: 17%
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-independent.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xhigh); official main questions
Metric: pass@5, 100 main questions, no tools, August 2026 grading
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Reconciled against the exact model/configuration in the evaluator’s public source. Updated source value recorded explicitly; best published reasoning mode selected within the same benchmark protocol.
BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals: 72.222%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 72.222 for Grok 4.6 High on BioMysteryBench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals: 70.788%
Not used in the score. Source category not recorded. Review status: unresolved.
Not admitted after the September 6 model review: the collected 70.788 for Grok 4.6 High on Tax Agent Bench v1 — Vals still lacks a matched source entry establishing its checkpoint and benchmark-specific metric, tools and retry setup. This is a citation/comparability gap, not a finding that the result is false or useless. More or maximum reasoning effort is not required.
RuneBench (30m, mean ln(1 + XP/min)): 5.621351 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.
Configuration: grok46-xhigh
Metric: Arithmetic mean of ln(1 + peakXpRate) over all 16 skills, exactly as the owner’s Heatmap.js default ranking. Data rates are already normalized; do not divide by 200 again.
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.
VoxelBench (text-to-voxel, Glicko-2): 2099 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.
Configuration: Grok 4.6 (xHigh)
Metric: Glicko-2 rating from the text-to-voxel board; not win percentage, deviation, image-input mode or MineBench Elo.
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.
Code Arena WebDev (overall): 1625 native-points
Contributes to the score. Source category: independent. Review status: reviewed-archive.
Configuration: grok-4.6-high
Metric: Published overall WebDev preference rating, not task success percentage or Arena Text score.
Original source · Retrieved 2026-09-06
Matched exact metric/value and the archived benchmark-specific configuration review. Unknown native effort stays explicitly unknown.
Cite this model record
The Latent. “Grok 4.6: score and benchmark evidence.” 2026-09-10. Release tli-2026-v1.0-2026-09-10-deepseek-3.
Download release data and definitions (JSON) · Data usage terms